|  
              
               Wolff’s 
                chapter on “Matriarchate and Patriarchate” 
               
                When I “discovered” that, among the final 
                chapters of the Dolomitensagen there was one titled “Matriarchate 
                and Patriarchate”, I hoped that eventually Wolff 
                had narrated in some more detail how had he introduced and developped 
                this topic in the Fanes’ saga. Unfortunately, this is only 
                a short presentation of the main anthropological concepts, devoted 
                to people who know nothing of the matter and therefore rather 
                simplistic, candid – and outdated. There is no reference 
                to the religious aspects of the story, nor to the interrelations 
                between matriarchate and totemism. Here I’m just providing 
                a short summary of Wolff’s 
                discussion, asking all those who wish to get deeper into a modern 
                vision of matriarchate to consult one out of the several books 
                available. 
                
               Wolff 
                starts by mentioning J.J. Bachofen, the Swiss 
                jurist who published a treaty on this subject in 1861: The 
                Matriarchal Right. An Essay on the Religious and Legal Features 
                of the Matriarchate in the Ancient World.  
                Later on, he examines the life conditions in the Paleolithic and 
                states that men were hunters and women gatherers, and that the 
                latter ones started cultivation, “maybe for the sake of 
                pretty flowers” (!). He developpes this concept stating 
                that a long-time practice with plants allowed women to learn the 
                basic concepts about vegetal life and thence to exploit it by 
                planting small gardens aside the village huts. This of course 
                required that at least a partial sedentariness had been reached. 
                The availability of a rather dependable supply of agricultural 
                products allowed to overcome the periods when game was scarce, 
                and so gave an important contribution to overall welfare. This 
                rudimentary form of horticulture had a great impulse when the 
                hoe was invented and the importance of some irrigation was understood. 
                Slowly, the gardens became more important than hunting and fishing, 
                so that they became the core of village economy – and they 
                were managed by women. What followed was that dwellings also were 
                owned by women, and therefore a husband-to-be was compelled to 
                move to his wife-to-be’s home. This structure was repeated 
                at the top of society: the undisputed chief was a queen, whose 
                husband was just a prince consort. 
                Probably at this moment, men started luring few wild animals into 
                fenced enclosures near their houses and, as they had a surplus 
                of vegetals available, feeding them when required. This way, breeding 
                was born: sheep and goats first, pigs later, cattle last. 
                According to Wolff, what brought 
                to the collapse of this scheme was the invention of the plough. 
                Domesticated cattle could be yoked to draw a plough in order to 
                cultivate much larger extensions of land, even though this type 
                of cultivation yelded much less per surface area than intensive 
                horticulture. But this type of agriculture was in the hands of 
                men. Ploughmen expanded their fields over and over, to the point 
                that quarrels arose for the ownership of the land, both within 
                any single village, and with neighbouring communities. Wars broke 
                out. As far as the social structure was concerned, this brought 
                to an upset: men had now become the pillars of economy and of 
                the sheer survival of the group, therefore power shifted into 
                their hands, often rather abruptly. 
                From this time onwards, the bridegroom no longer moved to live 
                in the bride’s home, on the contrary he often abducted her 
                (more or less consensually) to have her living in his own, to 
                the point that wives were considered a property of their husbands; 
                at the top of society, the king quickly became more important 
                than the queen and was considered as the highest and undisputable 
                authority. 
                Traces of the old matriarchal structure of society can be found, 
                however, even in several social groups of today, as well as in 
                many Dolomitic legends, one of which is the "Kingdom of Fanes". 
                 
               
                
               |