The 
                  Fanes' saga - Short essays 
                   
                The 
                  Flame Vulture  
                  
               
               
              The vulture is told to be living on the walls 
                of the Croda Vanna 
                (Sass dla Crusc) and to be related with the flüta, 
                i.e. a flame, usually described as bluish, that can be seen somewhere 
                on the wall every now and then. It seems that analogous occurrences 
                have also been observed on the Piz da Peres (a mountain 
                east of Marebbe, m 2507). 
                This apparently mysterious phenomenon may find a very simple explanation. 
                A self-lighting flame (far from human activities) is generally 
                related with the spontaneous self-combustion of some natural gas, 
                often derived from carrion rotting (will o’ the wisps). 
                We must remark, now, that both the Sass 
                dla Crusc and the Piz da Peres display an abrupt 
                drop on one face, while the other side only shows a mild slope, 
                so that the edge of the precipice can be attained quite easily. 
                Therefore, it is possible that animals, either surprised by thick 
                fog, or chased by a predator, occasionally fell down from the 
                cliff. Had this happened, the carrion would stop on the first 
                ledge that could retain it and there, on one hand it would attract 
                vultures, on the other, once in a while, a will o’the wisp 
                would appear. This might well explain why a link (actually an 
                indirect one) was observed between vultures and the mid-wall flame. 
                Notice that the phenomenon is told as being observable “once 
                per year”: a frequency (to be intended as average) fully 
                compatible with the proposed mechanism, i.e. a relatively rare 
                occurrence, albeit not an exceptional one at all. 
              It is quite plausible that the variul, 
                i.e. the vulture, that feeds on corpses, therefore “takes 
                them away”, has been considered as ideally taking possession 
                of the dead’s “vital spirit” as well. This type 
                of association is present in almost all cultures. More so, as 
                the Fanes area lacks both wood to burn corpses and earth to bury 
                them, it is probable that the first funeral rites simply consisted 
                of exposing the dead to carrion-eating birds, like vultures and 
                crows. Therefore, it is quite probable that the cult of the vulture, 
                which we can perceive at the root of the story of the “variul 
                de la flüta” was, at least at its origin, a form 
                of cult of the dead. 
               In 
                this perspective, we can also read the fact that the pseudo-eagle 
                is described as “the king of a far away island”: this 
                island indeed is but the world of the dead, with which the vulture 
                is strictly connected. Much more complex is the interpretation 
                of the “one-armed men”, a concept that will come back 
                several times over the legend. To this regard, I may only advance 
                an hypothesis, to be taken just as such. 
                These “one-armed men”, who at the end will actually 
                enter battle on the Fanes’ side, are described as gallant 
                warriors “armed with a sword”. What is missing to 
                a warrior, wearing a sword, but one-armed? Obviously, he can wear 
                no shield. We may guess, therefore, that the “one-armed 
                men” were a sect of “vulture-men” who vowed 
                fighting shieldless, “as if they were one-armed”. 
                We can be supported by anthropological comparisons, one one hand 
                with sects like the “jaguar-men” or the “eagle-men” 
                of the Aztecs, on the other with the Norwegian berserkers. These 
                entered battle in full nudity or only covered by wolf- or bear 
                skins, convinced to be “invulnerable”, or better that 
                their blind aggressive furor and the fame that preceeded them 
                represented their best defense (and invigorated in their warlike 
                virtues by the use of hallucinogen substances, maybe Amanita 
                muscaria, that brought them to lose their reason). The berserkers 
                also were a sect (sacred to Odin) and possessed a totem animal 
                (bear and/or wolf) that they believed to embody in battle. Like 
                the Fanes’ vulture-men, by the way, the berserkers also 
                ended up representing a cause of grave social upsetting, so that 
                king Erik of Norway was compelled to banish their society in 1015, 
                although they represented the élite corps of his army. 
                We must finally remark that the existence among the Fanes of a 
                sect of warriors consecrated to the vulture, within a society 
                still devoted to marmots, might have represented an intermediate 
                stage, a fundamental step towards the transition to a vulture-dominated 
                social order. 
                
                |